Update:This is a very old post, and the problem has since been rectified, but it still serves as an example of one of the major problems with Wikipedia – that being that once somebody gets moderator status they’re free to bend Wikipedia to their will. There’s practically no recourse for somebody who’s been banned from editing – whether for legit reasons or for reasons like I mention below. That’s one of the major problems with the site, and why I think the admin policy of Wikipedia sucks.
I’ve been banned from wikipedia. I’m not allowed to edit anything anymore. Did I spam? Nope. Was I vulgar? Nope. All I did was add relevant links to an article (and not even links to my own sites)
The article I’m talking about is the one on Internet Slang.
I not only added links to my own site: noslang.com (an authority site on internet slang according to Google, Kim Kommando, Ken Leebow, Wired, NBC etc..) but to a few other slang dictionaries and slang related sites as well. These included:
Ordinarily I wouldn’t be mad.. but Some Mod on a Power Trip, AbsolutDan seems to think that only the site: FOLDOC.org deserves to be linked there. He’s painstakenly removed every other site.
What’s so great about this site and not the others? Why is it given preferential treatment? Does Dan have a relationship with this site? My guess is probably.
It’s sad to see that wikipedia admins can go on power trips like this. What’s worse is, all of these sites were linked on wikipedia at one time, and have been there for over a year. All I did was put them all (not just mine) back after some crazy admin removed them all.
Since I can’t edit it… if anybody else wants to help out in this cause, simply copy and paste the following wikipedia code:
This site has had a newsy type feel for the last 10 posts or so. That’s not normal. So…. to get back to the blogging side of things, here’s some cool quotes I recently came upon and thought were worth mentioning.
“A Country Music CD is the best therapy $15 can buy” – Dierks Bentley
“When facism comes to America it will be draped in the flag and carrying the cross” – Sinclair Lewis
“The largest danger to freedom is people in power who stand to lose power.” – unknown
“I contend we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you don’t believe in other gods, you’ll understand why I don’t believe in yours” – Stephen F Roberts
“There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. Deciding whether or not life is worth living is to answer the fundamental question in philosophy. All other questions follow from that.” – Albert Camus
“That’s some Bad Hat Harry” – π come on.. I couldn’t resist.
Lyons said that Piniella was “hablaing Espanol” — mispronouncing the phrase which means “to speak.” Lyons also said, “I still can’t find my wallet” and “I don’t understand him, and I don’t want to sit too close to him now” in regards to Piniella.
Now, this sounds pretty bad until you take into account what Piniella said before that. Lou made a bad cliche (as only Lou can) in which he compared the A’s to “finding a wallet on friday, and coming back to try to find one saturday and sunday.” Lou then made an “en fuego” comment.
Taking into account Lou’s previous cliche, one can see that that Steve’s comments weren’t racially inappropriate at all. They were in regards to Lou’s “finding a wallet” story. All he meant to say was that Lou was jumping from topic to topic and using too many cliches.
Now, if Fox would have come out and said “we’re firing Steve Lyons because he sucks” I’d have said “good job” – because frankly, Steve Lyons didn’t offer much of anything to that broadcast team. All that’s besides the point though. Fox was wrong to play the race card here. Perhaps they should pay more attention to their own broadcasts?
In other news, all decisions as to entertainment for the world series will be made by MLB and Fox, with no say what-so-ever from the Tigers. In a way that’s good because nobody wants to see Aretha or the various other Motown acts anymore, but I don’t want to see the inevitable American Idol singers either.
Jaws was on today. What a great movie. It made generations of Americans afraid to go into the water. The best thing about the movie is that you don’t even see the shark for the first hour and a half and it’s still a great thriller.
That’s what makes a great horror movie…. the Plot. It’s not about how much blood you have or how creatively you scare the person. It’s about letting your viewer identify with the plot. Let them put themselves into the position as the characters in the film – then they can be genuinely scared.
I also didn’t realize that the “bad hat harry” production company took it’s name from a scene in the opening half hour of jaws. I’ve always seen that at the end of House and thought “where have I seen that before?” Well, it’s a scene in Jaws where the old swimmer comes up to Cheif Brody complaining and the cheif just looks at him and he says “that’s some bad hat harry” in reference to his swim cap.
Just a great movie.. Too bad I can’t say the same for Jaws 4.
The Sun-Sentinal (don’t ask why I’m reading Florida newspapers) has a Recent Article about a “parents primer” in which parents are encouraged to spy on their kids.
“Spy. Spy. Spy,” Sgt. Anthony DeMarco told the crowd of about 40 parents, school administrators and district officials. “Your parents did it to you. Now, it’s your turn.”
While many parents are quick to advocate spying in order to keep their kids safe, it’s not really the best alternative. Using the word “spy” is an indication to kids that they’re not trusted – and that’s just not good parenting. I’m not saying you shouldn’t care about what your kids are doing online; there’s just a better way of doing it.
Instead of spying on them, simply befriend them. Create your own MySpace and Facebook profiles and add your kids as friends. Make an AOL instant messenger account and put your kid on your buddy list. Read their profiles and away messages (after all, they are public information.) If they don’t let you add them, then you can start worrying.
Explain to your kids that anything they post on the internet is public, and they have no expectation of privacy with this material. It’s also a good time to teach them that things they post are permanent, and that potential employers might just end up seeing pictures of them in their underwear holding that beer bottle.
Don’t risk your parent-child relationship by spying. Instead, strengthen it by taking an active role in their online social life.
Here’s another lesson to journalists and bloggers: If you’re going to write a fear mongering article about how out of control drugs have become in our schools, it’s best not to back up your data with quotes like this one about schools implementing drug searches on students:
“99-percent is all for it,β White said citing the survey. βOne percent said ‘no.’ And that one percent put on their paper: I use drugs that’s why I wouldn’t want it in the school.”
Ignoring the grammatical mistakes (which isn’t easy), the facts of this quote simply don’t support your article. If most teens are using drugs, then why do 99% support drug searching in school? It would seem to me, that according to the student petition, only 1% of the students are using drugs. That’s not really a problem. In fact, it’s a sharp decrease in drug use.
I’m not saying that drug use isn’t a problem in schools – it probably is. I’m just saying make sure that your numbers make sense before over-reacting to everything.
Houston – Can using MySpace have long term health effects? A recent study by NoosCorp of Texas has shown that seniors who actively engage in social networking sites like MySpace, FaceBook, and Friendster tend to live longer, fuller, healthier lives. The survey took into account the listed ages of active MySpace users along with age breakdown from the 2004 census as well as various other factors. The results are quite shocking:
According to the numbers, over 90% of Americans over the age of 90 actively use MySpace. The site also seems immensely popular with Americans in their late 60’s. Roughly 300,000 Americans were born in 1937, and according to the study over 98% of living 69 year-olds actively maintain MySpace accounts.
Today’s seniors are using social networking sites to stay in touch with their friends, read up on new bands, and post photos of themselves hitting the bong in their underwear.
“Looking at the photos, you’d never know these ladies were in their nineties.. I’d give anything to look that good when I’m that age,” said Doris Shelton, a 34 year old mother of 2 whose daughters frequently use the site MySpace.com. “Seniors are surprisingly hip,” she said. “I never knew my daughter was so active in helping the elderly. Nearly half of her friends are in their late 60’s or older. In fact just yesterday she was talking with a 69 year old man from our town.” notes Mrs Shelton.
“It used to be that once a spouse died, a widowed senior would spend their days moping around depressed,” said James Blutner – a clinical psychologist and avid MySpace user. “What’s happening now,” he says, “is that these once depressed seniors are turning to social networking sites as a way to meet new people. It’s a fun, healthy alternative to bingo night. I just wish they’d stop posting those pictures of themselves in their underwear – although most of them still look good for 90!”
When asked why he thought social networking through sites like MySpace would have a positive health effect, Mr. Blutner replied, “It could be many things. It could be the positive emotional effect of connecting to other people their own age, or simply the healthy side effect of so much sex. Everyone knows that the 69 year-olds are a pretty randy bunch… if you know what I mean.”
Blutner – who is also studying the link between online poker and terrorism – continued: “It’s really nice to have a site like MySpace that contains such a representative sample of modern elderly Internet users. The amount of truthful data we have access to about someones personal life is really hard to get by any other means, since people tend to exaggerate or outright lie on our psychological surveys. These social sites are a blessing in disguise with their accurate demographics. It’s like Psychology 2.0!”
Mad Props to Xichekolas for helping with this one.
Sleep easier at night America and terorrists beware – our ports are now much more safer than they’ve ever been. Did we step up security? Make new legislation about imports? Hire more drug sniffing dogs? Increase coast guard prescence? No, of course not… we did the most logical thing we could have done: We banned online poker.
That’s right, the new Safe Port Act included a back room rider that introduce legislation aimed at enforcing a ban of online gambling. The new law restricts banks and credit card companies from dealing with online poker sites, effectively locking players out of depositing or withdrawing money from their accounts.
The irony here is that while most online poker sites were actually legit, many players will end up losing all the money in their accounts because of this law – since the sites may have no way of returning their money.
So what does online poker have to do with port security? And why was this added as a back room rider? (this means that there was no debate or discussion about this part of the bill. Chances are many legislators didn’t even know it was tacked on.) Those are good questions, and I’ve written to both of my state’s representatives asking for answers. I haven’t receieved any replies so far, and It doesn’t look like I’m going to.
It’s worth noting that this new law won’t prevent die-hard gamblers from transfering money offshore then into their poker accounts, but it will prevent spur of the moment deposits from spontaneous first time gamblers. That in itself should be enough to send many seasoned gamblers running for the withdrawl button. Successful online poker players don’t like to play against other good players. They depend upon these new players and their sporatic deposits. In the ocean you don’t see sharks eating other sharks. In the online world however, that may be the only way to play.
Some of you who date back may remember when Alexander, VanGogh, LMNOP and I first tried to bring dotCULT back from the dead. If you do, you’ll remember that my first post on the site was titled quixotical – (n.) Idealistic without regard to practicality. To date it’s still one of my favorites.
Anyway, I’ve since given permission to David Seaman to include it in his upcoming book entitled “The Real Meaning of Life”. It’ll be listed under my real name, Ryan Jones.
It’s a real book, in print, that will be available sometime in early to mid September. While I’m not seeing any profits from this, I do encourage everybody to head on over to Amazon.com and Preorder a copy of The Real Meaning of Life. It’s only $11.00 and you’ll have the opportunity to own one of my very first articles in print.
As a bonus, a brand new, un-released on a website poem of mine also appears in the book… Under the name HockeyGod. (making me the only contributer of the book to be published twice).
Some of you who date back may remember when Alexander, VanGogh, LMNOP and I first tried to bring dotCULT back from the dead. If you do, you’ll remember that my first post on the site was titled 
